Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Articles of War

  1. #1

    Default Articles of War

    No wonder British sailors deserted in droves to join the U S Navy:

    http://www.hmsrichmond.org/rnarticles.htm

  2. #2
    Able Seaman
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West Sussex
    Log Entries
    57
    Name
    Mark

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coog View Post
    No wonder British sailors deserted in droves to join the U S Navy
    No such thing in 1757, mate !

    Actually several of our famous captains came from loyalist American stock, not to mention the Americans who fought on the British side below decks ...

    Best wishes,

    Mark Barker
    The Inshore Squadron

  3. #3
    Master & Commander
    United States

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Log Entries
    2,027
    Name
    Chris

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coog View Post
    No wonder British sailors deserted in droves to join the U S Navy:

    http://www.hmsrichmond.org/rnarticles.htm
    As Mr. Barker notes: The US Navy did not exist in 1757; however, one sees why so many sailors went pirate (in an earlier era) or into the USN (after such became an option). That said: In some ways, the USN was just as bad -- IIRC, the USN didn't abolish flogging until 1850:

    http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/flogging.htm
    http://www.navalhistory.org/2010/09/...ars-ago-today/ .

  4. #4

    Default

    Of course I was referring to the decades around 1800 in reference to the U S Navy and exagerating a bit with the term "droves." Most British sailors fought valiantly despite their lot. I was reading about The Articles of War during the Napoleonic Era and it sounded as if they had not changed much, if any, since 1757. Does anyone know when there was a substantial change?

  5. #5
    Able Seaman
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West Sussex
    Log Entries
    57
    Name
    Mark

    Default

    Officially not until Victorian times, but the draconian punishments contained in the Articles had largely fallen into disuse long before then. Like a lot of things in British law, the written law says one thing, actual custom and practice another thing entirely.

    This link is a pretty decent 1-page summary.

    http://www.pdavis.nl/NDA.htm

    The comment that the British largely fought valiantly 'despite their lot' in an interesting one. Undoubtedly in times of war and with the tender attentions of the press gang there were an awful lot of people in the Royal Navy who would rather not have been there, but the representation of the British crews (who actually comprised people from many nations) as brutalised convicts only kept in check by appalling discipline is old hat.

    They could not have fought that well if they had been treated like that.

    Compared to an agricultural labourer of the time, a sailor in the Royal Navy was guaranteed three meals a day every day of high calorific value, had access to rudimentary medical care and a basic death/disablement pension (the Chatham chest) and would receive a flogging for an act of petty theft rather than being hanged as would his land-based counterpart.

    Life in those days was no picnic ashore either ....

    Best regards,


    Mark Barker
    The Inshore Squadron

  6. #6
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,145
    Name
    David

    Default

    No wonder British sailors deserted in droves to join the U S Navy
    There was also the small matter of the RN being engaged in a war. deserting to the US meant a rather lower chance of being killed by a roundshot or splinter. Think draft dodgers heading for Canada in the 60s and 70s

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •