Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Portland 50s

  1. #1
    Stats Committee
    Master & Commander
    United States

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Maryland
    Log Entries
    2,013
    Blog Entries
    13
    Name
    Dobbs

    Default Portland 50s

    I have been pondering my Leander.

    Can anyone offer a plausible explanation in game terms why a 50 gun 4th rate mounting 24 pdrs on the lower deck has a similar broadside to a Hebe class frigate? Also, why would the Portlands have a better veer? The "O" deck seems to be an "E" deck with tighter turns. Why would a liner be able to turn tighter than a frigate? I see that Portlands were about 6' (2m) shorter than the Hebes. Is that a good enough reason for the tighter turning ability?

    This is your chance to stop me before I go all "House Rules" on this class.

  2. #2
    Admiral of the Fleet.
    Baron
    England

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Notts
    Log Entries
    22,307
    Blog Entries
    22
    Name
    Rob

    Default

    I had not actually remarked the stats for the Leander Dobbs. It does, however explain the bad showing of the ship in my game a few weeks ago. I can't think of any reason why the stats should be thus.
    It looks like "House Rules" game on to me.
    Rob.
    The Business of the commander-in-chief is first to bring an enemy fleet to battle on the most advantageous terms to himself, (I mean that of laying his ships close on board the enemy, as expeditiously as possible); and secondly to continue them there until the business is decided.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •