Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 56 of 56

Thread: Latest news on Wave 2

  1. #51
    Retired Admiral of the Fleet
    Admiral
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago/Bloomington IL
    Log Entries
    5,095
    Name
    Eric

    Default

    That's wonderful.

    You should make some sort of rank progression based on experience points. By the time she is a teenager, she'll be an admiral.

    I was telling a colleague today about WoG and SoG, and encouraged him to come with his son when we play. I think starting to play wargames when I was in grade school has benefited me to this day in terms of decision making, strategic planning, etc.

  2. #52
    Landsman
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Log Entries
    4
    Name
    Chris

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRIAN DUNBAR View Post
    My daughter and I haven't played or received everything from the first wave and she is already telling me we have to by the next 12 ships. I'm still paying off the first wave of products so hopefully they don't come too soon.
    They said they missed the lunar new year because of a shortage of supplies to make the navigation decks, and now expect to have Wave 2 hit the US by May.

  3. #53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    ...I would've chosen ... a Cruizer brig-sloop instead of a Swan to keep the focus on the Napoleonic Wars--there weren't many Swans left by the time Boney came along IIRC.)
    maybe the reason they didn't want to do the Cruizer was that it would have involved a different rigging style (on what they apparently envision as a short-turnaround project)? With the Swan it's just a matter of scaling down something they know works. With the Cruizer presumably some basic assumptions on packaging and model design/production would need to be retested

  4. #54
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,144
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fredmiracle View Post
    maybe the reason they didn't want to do the Cruizer was that it would have involved a different rigging style (on what they apparently envision as a short-turnaround project)? With the Swan it's just a matter of scaling down something they know works. With the Cruizer presumably some basic assumptions on packaging and model design/production would need to be retested
    I wonder if it would have made that much difference/ Not to the model I suppose (it would be a simpler construct), but the packaging maybe.....

    That said, so many of the ships in the original release for the "Napoleonic Wars" stem are depicted from periods that aren't Napoleonic so a few more wouldn't hurt :)
    Last edited by David Manley; 02-01-2014 at 05:50.

  5. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    I wonder if it would have made that much difference/ Not to the model I suppose (it would be a simpler construct), but the packaging maybe.....
    would the triangular sails on the bowsprit be bigger, or not? I thought maybe that would have something to do with it, but it's just uninformed conjecture on my part...

  6. #56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    That said, so many of the ships in the original release for the "Napoleonic Wars" stem are depicted from periods that aren't Napoleonic so a few more wouldn't hurt :)
    Except with a release time of one series a year, it makes the wait time for the truly Napoleonic ships longer.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •