Thanks all, for the feedback. Your unanimous position on using the 2nd hourglass makes sense and it's how I will proceed in future if this comes up again.

I wasn't using entanglement or boarding rules.

If I go with Rob's call on the actual movement Ship A moves first, but cannot move as it is already base to base with Ship B. Then Ship B would move using phase 2 of the #5 taken aback maneuver. That's not how I did it, but if I had it would have put the distance of the #5 taken aback card between the Philadelphia and the Royal Fortune. I can see the logic in this.

On the other hand I can see why Eric has a House Rule that addresses these situations. Rules, House Rules and common sense should allow me to handle this in future.

Thanks again!