Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: THE CARRONADE

  1. #1
    Master & Commander
    United States

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Washington
    Log Entries
    1,601
    Name
    Paul

    Default THE CARRONADE

    The carronade was a short-barrelled gun which threw a heavy ball developed by the Carron Company, a Scottish ironworks, in 1778. Because of irregularities in the size of cannon balls and the difficulty of boring out gun barrels there was usually a considerable gap between the ball and the bore - often as much as a quarter of an inch - with a consequent loss of efficiency. This gap was known as the "windage". The manufacturing practices introduced by the Carron Company reduced the windage considerably, enabling the ball to be fired with less powder and hence a smaller and lighter gun. The carronade was half the weight of an equivalent long gun, but could throw a heavy ball over a limited distance. The light weight of the carronade meant that the guns could be added to the forecastle and quarterdeck of frigates and ships of the line, increasing firepower without affecting the ship’s sailing qualities. It became known as the “Smasher” and gave ships armed with carronades a great advantage at short range.
    It was Lord Sandwich who eventually started mounting them in place of the light guns on the forecastle and quarterdeck of ships. They soon proved their effectiveness in battle. In the 1810s and 1820s tactics started to place a greater emphasis on the accuracy of long-range gunfire, and less on the weight of a broadside.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Cmmdre; 04-21-2013 at 11:07.

  2. #2
    Admiral. R.I.P.
    Admiral
    UK

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Norfolk
    Log Entries
    6,691
    Name
    David

    Default

    Carronades were not counted when discussing the number of guns on a ship, so a 36-gun ship may have 36 ordinary cannons plus carronades.

  3. #3
    Retired Admiral of the Fleet
    Admiral
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago/Bloomington IL
    Log Entries
    5,095
    Name
    Eric

    Default

    I have noticed many ships with number of guns listed actually contained more. Any particular reason why these were not counted?

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7eat51 View Post
    I have noticed many ships with number of guns listed actually contained more. Any particular reason why these were not counted?
    Perhaps this will help Eric:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating_...the_Royal_Navy

  5. #5
    Retired Admiral of the Fleet
    Admiral
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago/Bloomington IL
    Log Entries
    5,095
    Name
    Eric

    Default

    Thanks Bobby. That was an informative article.

  6. #6
    Master & Commander
    United States

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Washington
    Log Entries
    1,601
    Name
    Paul

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coog View Post
    That is why I love this site. One mention of something leads to more information through discussion. Thanks for the link Bobby.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •