Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: first broadside a thought

  1. #1
    Ordinary Seaman
    United States

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    nebraska
    Log Entries
    46
    Name
    john

    Default first broadside a thought

    Ok I may be wrong here, but it seams to me that the first broadside delivered from anywhere but close range would be less effective rather than more efective.

    Two reasons for this.

    1. The cannon barrels would be cold, thus accuracyt would suffer over longer ranges.

    2. Generaly a ship sailed with loaded cannon so as to be ready for combat so the surge bags could be a little dampened and thus less effective.

    I'm just speculating, I understand the phylosophy, and it certainly applies to musketry in land battles, but cannons on the high seas, I'm not so sure.

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2

    Default

    Unless under exceptionally heavy fire, the initial broadside is fired under a much more controlled manner than loading and firing as fast as you can.

  3. #3
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,143
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bakblast View Post
    2. Generaly a ship sailed with loaded cannon so as to be ready for combat so the surge bags could be a little dampened and thus less effective.
    Thats exactly what they didn't do (partly for that reason). Cannon were stowed inboard and unloaded until the ship beat to quarters.

    The rule also takes into account the longer time that the gun crews had to prepare the weapon (for example choosing the shot that had the best fit and hence the least windage) and having more time to sight for their first shot.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bakblast View Post
    ...

    2. Generaly a ship sailed with loaded cannon so as to be ready for combat so the surge bags could be a little dampened and thus less effective.
    Already answered by Mr. Manley.

  5. #5
    Ordinary Seaman
    United States

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    nebraska
    Log Entries
    46
    Name
    john

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    Thats exactly what they didn't do (partly for that reason). Cannon were stowed inboard and unloaded until the ship beat to quarters.

    The rule also takes into account the longer time that the gun crews had to prepare the weapon (for example choosing the shot that had the best fit and hence the least windage) and having more time to sight for their first shot.
    That's exactly what I was waiting to here, and from whom I wanted to here it from.

    It should be pretty obvious to most that I was falling back on certain works of fiction as to the reasoning to point #2 of my original post.

    As to the first, what about the cold cannon at LONG range?

    Do you think that would be a factor?

    And now just to show how anal I can be......

    As far as "to quarters", I think it's two quarters, as in some sort of time signature on the drum, the call to clear for action and man your fighting station not go to your sleeping quarters (hamock)?

    Any percussionists out there to clarify?

    OK I'm waiting for a boot to the head.
    Last edited by bakblast; 07-20-2014 at 21:21.

  6. #6
    Midshipman
    Germany

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Log Entries
    187
    Name
    Sebastian

    Default

    According to a quick search leading to wikipedia results,

    it's "to quarter". The Royal Navy used the rythmn of "Heart of Oak", wich is a march. Marches at that time were either composed as 4/4 or 2/2. In which case you have a beat on every step while marching.

  7. #7
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,143
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bakblast View Post
    As far as "to quarters", I think it's two quarters, as in some sort of time signature on the drum, the call to clear for action and man your fighting station not go to your sleeping quarters (hamock)?
    Nope, definitely "to" not "two"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_quarters


  8. #8
    Ordinary Seaman
    United States

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    nebraska
    Log Entries
    46
    Name
    john

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post
    According to a quick search leading to wikipedia results,

    it's "to quarter". The Royal Navy used the rythmn of "Heart of Oak", wich is a march. Marches at that time were either composed as 4/4 or 2/2. In which case you have a beat on every step while marching.
    "Steady boys steady" I still prefer the "Grenadiers March" though it's not nautical at all.

    I actually got the "two quarters" from an old National Geographic issue from the sixties, I have it around the house somewhere, if I find it, and my memory is correct(always a dubious proposition) I'll post it for posterity.

    However given that a time signature is mentioned, and it is a wiki page...I still wonder, could it have started out "two" then as a phrase been written as "to"?

    Kind of how two pence is spoken as tupence (parden my phonics).

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bakblast View Post
    ...

    As to the first, what about the cold cannon at LONG range?...
    Sorry, never heared or read that this had any influence on the shooting ability/range of a Napoleonic blackpouder cannon.

  10. #10
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,143
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comte de Brueys View Post
    Sorry, never heared or read that this had any influence on the shooting ability/range of a Napoleonic blackpouder cannon.

    It would have an effect, the rate of compustion of the powder / propellant increasing with temperature. I doubt whether the effects would be noticeable within the parameters of the game

  11. #11
    Midshipman
    Germany

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Log Entries
    187
    Name
    Sebastian

    Default

    In addition, i think it would be compensated by the benefits gained through carefully selecting the shot, loading the gun, aiming, synchronising the broadside.

    This just reminded me of the scene in Master and Commander, where the crew even works on the shot itself to become more round (though this is not a historical source).

  12. #12

    Default

    I'm a gunpouder shooter.

    For pistols (Napoleon Le Page) and Revolvers (Colt Navy) it makes no difference.

    I have to do some research for firing with cold barrels in the Napoleonic aera.

  13. #13
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,143
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post
    This just reminded me of the scene in Master and Commander, where the crew even works on the shot itself to become more round (though this is not a historical source).
    ...but it is historically accurate :)

  14. #14

    Default

    The standard broadside followed by he continuous fire rules probably represents more of what went on and captures that first full badass broadside.

  15. #15
    Retired Admiral of the Fleet
    Admiral
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago/Bloomington IL
    Log Entries
    5,095
    Name
    Eric

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    It would have an effect, the rate of compustion of the powder / propellant increasing with temperature. I doubt whether the effects would be noticeable within the parameters of the game
    If explaining to a layman, what would be the practical real-world effects? I am unknowledgeable about this, but interested.
    “You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation.” ― Plato

  16. #16
    Comptroller of the Navy Board
    Captain
    United States

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    WA
    Log Entries
    4,298
    Name
    [RESTRICTED]

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    ...but it is historically accurate :)
    Obviously some here have never heard of...

    *CSI: Miami Horatio Caine Glasses Pull*

    "Polishing the Cannonball."
    Last edited by Diamondback; 07-24-2014 at 23:07.

  17. #17

    Default

    Don't know if the so called "cold bore shot" counts for Napoleonic smooth-bore artillery.

    (For sniper rifles and modern artillery I have heared about.)

    But I think it makes no difference for the accuracy and range of Napoleonic black powder cannons.

    I think the used weight and quality of black powder had more influence on the shot.

  18. #18
    Surveyor of the Navy
    Captain
    UK

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Log Entries
    3,143
    Name
    David

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7eat51 View Post
    If explaining to a layman, what would be the practical real-world effects? I am unknowledgeable about this, but interested.
    The practical effects would be that the initial impulse imparted to the round would vary, and hence the velocity of the round (and so that could translate into a variation in range). In extreme cases, with more modern propellants and breech loading weapons in particular, this could lead to a partial or full detonation of the propellant (which would be bad - saw a very interesting video of this happening to a 155mm howitzer, with lots of very lucky people nearby who were missed by the bits of breech and barrel that were flying around!)

  19. #19
    Retired Admiral of the Fleet
    Admiral
    United States

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago/Bloomington IL
    Log Entries
    5,095
    Name
    Eric

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Manley View Post
    The practical effects would be that the initial impulse imparted to the round would vary, and hence the velocity of the round (and so that could translate into a variation in range). In extreme cases, with more modern propellants and breech loading weapons in particular, this could lead to a partial or full detonation of the propellant (which would be bad - saw a very interesting video of this happening to a 155mm howitzer, with lots of very lucky people nearby who were missed by the bits of breech and barrel that were flying around!)
    Thank you, David. Now I understand.
    “You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation.” ― Plato

  20. #20

    Default

    Those old smooth bore cannons firing from a wave rolling ship with the crudely made balls and powder of that era and pretty much lacking effective sights weren't exactly known for their incredible accuracy. A 5-10% improvement to extremely crappy is still extremely crappy.
    Really the only significant difference on that first broadside is that everyone is ready to go at the same time. I just don't see justification for a complicating special rule for it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •